Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decagrex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decagrex[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 21:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The company does exist, which is good as far as it goes. But there's no indication that the firm is notable under our rules. Happy to revisit if sources are presented, but my admittedly quick look came up with no hint at notability. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 00:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability or significance; just a company going about its business. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.