Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah McCallum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah McCallum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Patently non-notable actress. Literally nothing can be found online beyond IMDb, where her whopping three roles (only one recurring) are listed. WP:N failed.

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not all actors are notable. Needs more sources than IMDb. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to ZZZap!#Cast as an alternative to deletion - A few roles with the best known being the zzZap TV and my first searches (News, Books and browser) quickly found nothing. SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience ^t 18:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 18:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - The subject fails GNG with aplomb. Absolutely no trace of anything ever having been written about this person. 82.132.244.222 (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR with a non-notable career in the 1990s. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG, –Davey2010^Talk 02:23, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.