Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Hutchison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah Hutchison[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC notability requirements and all WP:AUTHOR criteria. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~Keep following sourcing - absolutely nothing beyond the most minor of mentions (which may not even be referring to her) in a preliminary Google News/Google Books search. Incidentally, why was this discussion listed under Fashion? Mabalu (talk) 12:14, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to meet WP:BIO through coverage in several articles in the Chicago Tribune. I've added a couple to the article, though the one that has greater depth of coverage is paywalled. Searches for "Deborah Rosen" and "Rosen-Knutsen Casting" bring up more sources. Her "Bill Your Ex" system and other idiosyncratic legal documents have been written up in some places. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 20:32, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 23:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She hasn't done anything very impressive, but she meets WP:GNG/WP:BASIC. I added more refs: there's press covering over 20 years. Not sure if we need to list her Alumni Outstanding Service award, though. --Colapeninsula (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Good work on the sourcing. I'm still not wholly convinced, but it's good enough for me to change my vote. Mabalu (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.