Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debian Pure Blend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Debian Pure Blend[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:NSOFT, no significant coverage in WP:RS, reads somewhat promotional, also contains a section akin to a WP:LINKFARM. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article needs improvement, not deletion. It has no references, but a quick search finds independent sources. The fact that a section may be a WP:LINKFARM is also not reason for deletion, but for improving that section. Greenman (talk) 17:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meh - weak keep, or merge to Debian. Has two RS, others exist [1] [2] . linkfarm fixed. AFDISNOTCLEAUP. meets spirit of WP:NSOFT "significant in its particular field" with the caveat that sources seem rare. Widefox; talk 16:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 05:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.