Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debasish Kundu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Debasish Kundu[edit]

Debasish Kundu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Rbreen (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • comment It might be worthwhile sifting through prior versions. There may be content and/or sourcing that would paint a clearer picture of the subject. Dlohcierekim 14:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Sources such as this one (p.36) or this are articles that the good doctor has written himself, in unreliable or closely affiliated sources. Then there is www.esciencecentral.org/journals/spagyric-medicine-purification-of-body-mind-and-spirit-2327-5162.1000141.pdf?aid=20111[predatory publisher] this journal article] which discusses such novel concepts as "water geometry", Biological transmutation and my personal favorite, "Based on the principle of quantum physics, subtle energy information of spagyric essences influence and harmonize the elemental information levels of the consciousness, emotions, behavior, thoughts, connections, soul and spirit, from DNA to cells, it harmonize our energy fields." In my opinion, this is a clear example of a poorly-sourced, highly-promotional article about a non-notable practitioner of alternative medicine, and I'm being very kind. - MrX 14:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Another article at the intersection of WP:FRINGE, low notability, and promotion; making it impossible to write neutral content. bobrayner (talk) 15:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No support for notability. The sources given are frankly preposterous. - - MrBill3 (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.