Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathsaurus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deathsaurus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails to establish notability. The singular "top 12" list is insufficient on its own. TTN (talk) 13:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A single listicle in WP:RS does not confer notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An especially minor Transformers character with nothing in the way of sources that denotes any sort of notability. And no, a single, half-paragraph length humor entry does not help it meet the GNG. At the very least, a Redirect to List of Decepticons can be possible, but it certainly should not be preserved as a stand alone article. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.