Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death vomit records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Death vomit records[edit]

Death vomit records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable label GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Underground, long-defunct record label. I tagged it for notability. The article title is misspelled, no sources are cited, and even though two notable bands were signed to it (Impaled and Rotten Sound, whom are not mentioned in the article, but one of their albums were released by Deathvomit), Phobia (band) is currently a redirect to Relapse Records, though they are notable, since there are reliable sources about them and they have entries on multiple wikis, enwiki excluded. But this discussion is not about Phobia so I will talk about Deathvomit Records. This article reminds me more of a company database entry than an actual WP article. I haven't found anything about the label during a Google search, only the Wiki article. The rest of the results are related to an Indonesian death metal band called "Death Vomit" (they have their own Wiki article as well), and the word "records" is in connection with them. I have also found another label called "Puke & Vomit Records", and other stuff with the words separately ("death", "vomit" and "records"). But seriously, the only thing I found about Deathvomit Records is the Wiki article. Therefore, I am highly doubtful of its notability. This article has been sitting here in this state since 2007. But even if notability is proven by reliable, secondary sources, the article can't stay in a state like this (and it should be renamed). GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - How this article has remained for so long beats me. Foxnpichu (talk) 16:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability; if it can be proved that it existed, then redirect to Necropolis Records Spiderone 18:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Love the name, but it's clearly WP:MILL and fails WP:NCORP. Bearian (talk) 20:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ’’’Delete’’’ fails everything WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG Not a single citation, not even more than what - 2 sentences of content in total? Duncan079 (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.