Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Metal (Possessed demo) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Death Metal (Possessed demo)[edit]

Disputed prod (didn't see the prior AfD). Article sports one book as a source, claiming it as possibly the origin of the term "Death Metal. However, there is no in depth coverage. Book says, it total, one sentance: "Meanwhile, in 1983, the term was co-coined by some American teens who formed the band Possessed and labeled their demo 'Death Metal'". Sources found for prior AfD were similarly shallow. While it might be worth including in Death metal, this article does not meet general notability guidelines: substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Raised by User:SummerPhD

AfD report broken, I'm fixing it. Count me as Neutral on this. Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 22:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, preferably speedy I put up for speedy. This it the third go round. It has one reference that isn't about it per se. Maybe this topic should be redirected to prevent further recreations of a non-notable demo that should be included in the appropriate article (if at all). ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it failed WP:MUSIC#Albums then, it fails WP:MUSIC#Albums now. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:58, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and fuck you Inx272 ^"Talk"

What was your reason for keeping? If would be useful to know if you think it is notable and why (for example). Thanks. Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 15:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: or if a reliable reference can be found Keep. – Jerry^teps 23:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.