Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Egg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Contact me if you want to transwiki. Coredesat 05:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Death Egg

Death Egg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is a fictional location that does not have real world information to establish notability. It is currently covered in Dr. Eggman and the games that it appears, and there is no current assertion for improvement. TTN (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. TTN (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - WP:GAMECRUFT. We need to get more efficient at this. Changing to Redirect to Dr. Eggman per User:Sceptre below. User:Krator (t c) 22:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Krator. Shiva Evolved (talk) 22:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose, nomination in bad taste, user of sockpuppets. I think TTN is using sockpuppets, specifically Krator and Shiva Evolved. RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 23:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

  Comment That's a serious accusation. Your evidence? -Verdatum (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

  RingtailedFox, I can assure you that these editors are not sock-puppets of TTN (and neither am I). I advice you politely to not let wikistress get to you so that you do and say things that you later regret. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

  After reading what a sockpuppet is, I must say I am a little amused rather than taking offense. Shiva Evolved (talk) 01:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Fails to show WP:N. WP:RS. Redundant information to other articles that does not appear worthy or needing of a fork. -Verdatum (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly transwiki if someone wants it, per nom and also per WP:NOT#GUIDE. It is unlikely that there's significant secondary coverage anywhere, making even a merge seem unfeasonable though not impossible. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• The thing is, i make sure i say the right things before posting them. My evidence for this? they all compliment each other on their actions, all follow each other (and me) to nominate video-game-related articles for merge or (preferrably) deletion, and they have the same spelling patterns., with things as "he's a fantastic contributer", or "we need to get better at this" (this being mass-nominating articles for deletion using bots). RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 23:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Please see Checkuser if you're sure, anything else just muddies the water. The reason that these articles are AfD'ed is because they fail too many policies and guidelines to be "repaired", nothing else. If you wish to avoid AfD (a reasonable thing), bring articles in line with policies and guidelines before the chance of AfD comes up. Sometimes, this may not be possible at all, and the only option is to AfD. – sgeureka ^t•c 23:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete after transwiki'ing to Sonic News Network wiki if they want it - article entirely consisting of in-universe details with no sources establishing real-world notability. --Stormie (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and WP:NOT#GUIDE/WP:GAMECRUFT. --Jack Merridew 11:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Eusebeus (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Lawrence Cohen 17:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Dr. Eggman. It's a plausible search term, but can't go to either Sonic 2 or Sonic 3. Will ^(talk) 19:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No reliable secondary sources, no notability claimed outside of Sonic the Hedgehog. A redirect after the deletion may be a good idea, though; redirects are cheap. --Phirazo 18:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.