Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dear Cathy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:55, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Cathy[edit]
I couldn't verify this with google, sounds bogus. A prank. feydey 00:19, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete nonsense. Jasmol 01:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. Cnwb 01:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. And to think I wasted a "move article to proper namespace" for this. 23skidoo 01:12, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree this warrants Speedy as G1. --JJay 01:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Bogus. Don't forget to delete the Dear cathy redirect too. Turnstep 01:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Linuxbeak | Alex Schenck 01:44, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. PJM 05:06, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - nonsense!! ERcheck 06:23, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy {{nonsense}}. NSLE (讨论) \<extra> 08:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or speedy this and the image, since it doesn't have any licensing info. jni 08:01, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as speedy Pintele Yid 08:09, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsense Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 14:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Either it's a neologism, in which case it needs to be deleted, or it's completely bogus nonsense, in which case it needs to be speedily deleted. Either way, it needs to be deleted. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah} 14:06, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, falls short of verifiability. HGB 10:55, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nonsense. *drew 02:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.