Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Morstad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:36, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dean Morstad[edit]
- Dean Morstad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is with a heavy heart that I nominate this article for deletion. While I have nothing against Dean Morstad personally (in fact, I agree with him on quite a few issues and may vote for him in November, since I live in MN), I don't think he satisfies WP:N for politicians just yet. Ole Savior didn't, and neither does Morstad since he hasn't received enough national media coverage. If Morstad runs again in a few years and gets more coverage, he'll be notable then. LonelyBoy2012 (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the nominator that Morstad dosen't have significant coverage (he gets little more than a mere mention in the sources listed in the article) in reliable secondary sources, and thus dosen't satisfy WP:POLITICIAN or the notability guideline for biographies.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the above comments, a google search did not provide any sources of note either. Does not meet qualifications for WP:POLITICIAN and notable biographies. Also written as an advertisement for the "candidate."Righteousskills (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.