Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Harrington

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Harrington[edit]

Dean Harrington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing shows he's notable in the entertainment business and the coverage isn't enough to meet WP:GNG. Jakejr (talk) 07:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Article creator here. I'm very surprised that although the person is claimed to have been a pioneer of various fields, somehow there is very little coverage of him at all, even in Chinese or Japanese sources.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails all possibly relevant notability criteria. None of WP:MANOTE, WP:NACTOR, or GNG are met. Astudent0 (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment All of his voice acting is in video games so adding the WikiProject to the list. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I went through the top hits—not seeing any reliable sources offhand czar 01:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.