Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Faiello
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:15, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dean Faiello[edit]
Doctor cited for malpractice. I think I remember hearing about this in the news a few years back, but really, does that count for notability anymore? This is still just one crime. 376 Google hits doesn't say much, either. Delete as non-notable.--InShaneee 02:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I ran an all English-language news Lexis search on "dean faiello" "maria cruz" over the past 3 years and got 6 hits. George 11:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as NN. Turnstep 14:54, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep--if it made the news, it was notable; she was a budding prominent New York Filipina-American businesswoman (banker). I just checked Google and got 908 hits! Thanks!! Karas [email protected] 19:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Forgive me, but I don't think I'd ever use the terms 'budding' or 'prominent' in conjunction with 'banker'. Additionally, 908 Google hits is still pretty small for the purpose of establishing notability, and either way, a lot of those hits don't seem to be the correct person, anyway.
- Which Google are you using? With quotes (the proper way) there are 385 hits, without quotes, 585. Turnstep 03:43, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Note that the victim gets the hits. Any in-the-news item will get a great many archaic hits for when it was in the news, and this is especially true for any person in the news in New York City. However, there were no lasting effects of the crisis that make this a lasting topic. WP is not the police blotter nor a news wire. Geogre 22:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of particular notability. Tuf-Kat 21:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.