Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dealing with corruption in Canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete

Dealing with corruption in Canada[edit]

Utterly useless list of links to other articles. Only one line of value which can easily be merged. MartinDK 12:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - hmmm, that is strange, not quite a how to, more appropriate for some canadaian reference site. If somebody is looking for information on that, they would probably not come here. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This isn't us.wikipedia.org; Canadian subjects are no less notable than American ones. However, this isn't a subject but a very short bout of original research ending in a triumvirate of links. --Charlene 12:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original research as well; what reliable sources does the article give to prove that these are the only recourses Canadians have when dealing with graft and corruption? (Hint: They missed the most important one, the ballot box.) --Charlene 12:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Is there any question?Balloonman 21:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.