Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deale Chamberlain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deale Chamberlain[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Youth football player who does not meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:N guidelines Jmorrison230582 (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia:ATHLETE#Association football says "Players who have appeared, and managers who have managed, in a fully-professional league (as detailed here), will generally be regarded as notable." Chamberlain has only played youth/reserve football, as far as I can see. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 13:16, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – From what I see, he is not notable. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. fails NSPORTS. article created by blocked sock with history of creating non-notable youth footballer articles, often with false or exaggerated info. --ClubOranje^T 10:27, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 18:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have removed the Senior career section from the infobox, as he appears to have only played youth/reserve football for both clubs (and the reference for the loan to Leeds explicitly states it is a Youth loan) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as he fails both WP:GNG, and WP:ATHLETE. --Carioca (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.