Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deal or No Deal (UK game show) records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deal or No Deal (UK game show) records[edit]

As I looked through other game show articles: I see NO other records pages. Deal or No Deal shouldn't be the first to start this trend. As I stated in the other Deal or No Deal AFDs a while ago: make a gameshow Wiki and put this information there. It certainly shouldn't be here. Encyclopedia: not a guide to game show records. RobJ1981 19:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Deal or No Deal (UK game show). I disagree 100% with RobJ, but I don't believe this article can stand on its own. Just H 20:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clean up - the existing show page is already 55K, making merge difficult. All facts are verifiable against original transmissions. Lack of precedent is no ground to delete; I would expect any reputable encyclopaedia to treat all television broadcasts according to their notability and no other criterion. Eludium-q36 20:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fancruft, unencyclopedic Bwithh 23:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. --- RockMFR 00:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's FAR too much trivia and the like in the main article already. I can't see anything in this article worth merging that isn't there already. - fchd 11:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep. The main DOND article is already long as it is. The records are a handy source of information SS4 17:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the proper place for trivia like this is on a fan site. Not a general purpose encyclopedia. - fchd 17:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not original research or a copyright violation, it is written from a neutral point of view. It is not a directory or an indiscriminate selection of information, for editors select the categories they deem notable. "Trivia" is the view of other contributors to this discussion, but I genuinely do not see how this article violates any clause of WP:NOT, or any other clause of WP:DELETE Eludium-q36 18:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the show's page, after slimming down the info. All of the facts may be verifiable, but they're not all encyclopedic. Inner Earth 18:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep is this like the deal or no deal massacre? I think we should keep at least SOME of the deal or no deal articles!

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.