Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Whispers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 10:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deadly Whispers[edit]

Deadly Whispers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Made-for-TV movie with 27% Rotten Tomatoes score; only ref is the RT page. Slashme (talk) 08:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 08:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A TV Guide entry isn't in-depth coverage and Letterboxd is user-generated content. Variety counts, but so far that's only one notability-relevant reliable source. --Slashme (talk) 08:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
People Magazine [[4]] and [[5]] Donaldd23 (talk) 10:23, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it also features relatively prominently in this Orlando Sentinel profile of Danza [6]. matt91486 (talk) 16:59, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as it has reviews in multiple reliable sources such as Variety and People magazine together with other courage so passes WP:GNG in my view so that deletion is unnecessary, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per multiple 3rd-party references listed above. --Lockley (talk) 03:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.