Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Betrayal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deadly Betrayal[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced article about a television film, not making or reliably sourcing any discernible claim to passing our notability criteria for either films or television shows. As always, every film that exists is not always guaranteed a Wikipedia article just because film directories like IMDb technically verify that it exists -- the notability test for films requires evidence of their significance, such as notable film or television awards and/or the reception of a WP:GNG-worthy volume of critical attention from established professional film or television critics. But there's no evidence that this film passes either of those tests, so it isn't entitled to a presumption of notability in the absence of any notability-building sources. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom there is not enough coverage available which can make this film meets WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 18:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I only found a single source that discussed the film in any depth, which isn't enough to merit a keep from me. It looks like this film was pretty much solidly ignored by the media. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lack of coverage, not enough sources that count towards the notability of the film. --Ashley yoursmile! 10:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.