Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dazzle (video recorder)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. New sources found are sufficient, no delete votes.(non-admin closure)‎ StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dazzle (video recorder)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NPRODUCT, lacks WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. The best I could find was a CNET review of one of the models and some trivial mentions in books that amount to "it is recording software that you can use." StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Computing. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Found a litany of sources from over the years. Sustained significant coverage exists. DigitalIceAge (talk) 00:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: per DigitalIceAge. Checking on ProQuest and Newspapers.com returns many results, indicating WP:SIGCOV throughout the years. The article was just never expanded upon, which DigitalIceAge has now done. B3251 (talk) 01:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.