Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Days of Summer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) ----DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Days of Summer[edit]
- Days of Summer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Small article (under 2KB) with no significant content - lets merge this with the artist's article. Dawnseeker2000 16:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:BEFORE points 2, 4 and 10. AfD is not for cleanup - suggest you go to the main article's talkpage and discuss the merger there. Lugnuts (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Lugnuts is right. An article that is small and unreferenced should be repaired and expanded by volunteer editors, not condemned to deletion. Also, if there were to be a merge, it should be to the album. But this article makes a claim of notability (the song appears to have reached the top ten in two countries) so that should be the starting point of this discussion. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Withdrawing the nomination. Dawnseeker2000 23:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.