Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaySmart Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DaySmart Software[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. A quick WP:BEFORE search didn't return anything worthwhile. Kleinpecan (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kleinpecan (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The MCSB award is somewhat questionable. First of all, its scope is limited to Michigan only and small businesses only. Second, the video about the winners 2012 doesn't mention the subject: https://vimeo.com/41492975 Third, the description of this specific category doesn't mention any significant accomplishments. The Inc5000 award has a wider scope, but the subject ranking is 4534, almost at the end of the list. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 17:39, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is purely promotional. Looking at the sources will show they are plain advertisements. Being ranked in 2020 at only 4534 on a "5000 list for ten consecutive years", means it wasn't notable when created by an SPA and is still not. -- Otr500 (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.