Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daxko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daxko[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to fail WP:ORG guidance. There are no results in GNews and matches in GBooks appear to be tangential or as part of lists/directories of companies. Apart from possibly being a "worthy" organization, there is nothing in the current article to expect the company has made impact on the historical record or other significance in order to expect suitable sources to be found to demonstrate notability in the near future. Fæ (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, advertising and typical: provides software as a service solutions and related services. Only claim of subminimal importance is inclusion on various trade related lists. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.