Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawntreader

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dawntreader[edit]

Dawntreader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability per WP:NMUSIC. Releases aren't major label, no evidence of WP:CHART, cursory search didn't turn up any good WP:RS for the band. Teemu08 (talk) 20:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:01, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The only WP:NMUSIC criterion they can really hope to pass is #1 — but the sources present here, while not terrible ones, aren't enough to clear NMUSIC #1 all by themselves if they're all we can do, and I can't find anything better either: even on a ProQuest search to find older coverage more contemporaneous to their period of activity, I still couldn't find anything but routine concert listings in Vancouver's local media (and irrelevant text matches on the C.S. Lewis novel, a Joni Mitchell song or a visual artist named Angela Dawntreader.) And we can't check off #11 just because the article claims that the band got playlisted on CBC Radio 3, either — the claim is completely unverifiable, because literally every single aspect of R3's old website that was once helpful in establishing or supporting NMUSIC notability for a band or musician (like the ability to check old playlogs or R3-30 charts to verify whether they ever really played a song or not) was thrown in the digital trashcan when it got swallowed up by the larger CBC Music website. It's not the claim to passing NMUSIC that gets a band into Wikipedia, it's the quality of the referencing that can be shown to properly support that the claim to passing NMUSIC is true — but the sourcing shown here isn't enough, and I can't find anything better. Bearcat (talk) 22:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.