Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DawnOfMen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DawnOfMen[edit]

Non-notable PC game; fails WP:SOFTWARE. Valrith 00:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "DawnOfMen" get 101 yahoo hits. Arbusto 00:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Wildnox 02:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found 477 yahoo hits. Yet, the game does fail the guide stated in WP:SOFTWARE. Yet, it is just a guide and not policy. I support deletion since the game is still in alpha production and I haven't seen any information about this game on any of the more popular gaming sites. --Pinkkeith 04:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm normally lenient on this, but if its not yet in beta, its not yet notable. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 06:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well, considering just what DOES pass for Wikipedia articles on games, I'm not sure delete is the answer. As it stands now, it's horrid, looking more like a blurb on a companies webpage ('Check back for more info later, etc), but that doesn't mean it doesn't have enough warrent to exist as a page. If someone could fix it... ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 12:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- consider this: if there's already sewage in a lake, do you dump even more in because it's already contaminated anyway? Garrett^Talk 01:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 20:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for its violations of the crystal ball policy and per nom. Sounds like a cool game. Write up an article when it's done and it has attained some notability (and reliable sources that we can use to write an article within the bounds of NPOV). Captainktainer * Talk 02:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vanity/advertisement by author of page. --138.88.84.36 18:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete This article should be deleted due to it seeming like an ad, but if its cleaned up, I see no problem with it. I know people are going to throw WP:Software, but there are many articles that warrant an article less than this one, just look at a lot of the games on List of open source games. guitarhero777777 23:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 03:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SWATJester. Qball6 04:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.