Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davis Museum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 18:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Davis Museum[edit]

Davis Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I agree, I find no reliable sources covering either a Davis Museum in Barcelona or a Davis Lisboa Mini-Museum, just a bunch of social media presences. Largoplazo (talk) 20:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Based on those facts, it seems more of an advertisement for the museum than an actual article (especially with the wording). --Sky Sushi (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The article is substantially promotional/POV now since being edited by Davislisboa, who was preceded by Davismuseum, though the latter user's changes were reverted. The article had a history before that—though it isn't clear to me that the version before these edits was substantially less POV, and, anyway, notability is the sine qua non issue here. Largoplazo (talk) 20:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment Does seem to be a POV article. Could we perhaps check if the IP addresses on the account are somehow associated with the museum? -Sky Sushi (talk) 23:00, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence of significant independent coverage, not notable --DannyS712 (talk) 22:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this PROMO for a non-notable work of conceptual art dubbed "Davis museum" by its creator.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.