Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davincci Lourenço de Almeida

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Davincci Lourenço de Almeida[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BLP1E Without the unproven claim that he delivered a bag of money to Lula this person is eminently non-notable. Domdeparis (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The claim that he delivered a bag of money to Lula, former presidente, was made by him to a major news publication in Brazil and had major repercussions, including a lawsuit from the former president against him and the publication. The claim in unproven because it is being discussed in the Justice system, but the mere fact that it was made, against such a notable public figure, is relevance enough in my opinion. Furthermore he is not only noticeable for one event, he has accused major political figures in other unrelated cases, as the cited accusation against federal congressman Russomanno. In this case, the congressman himself made a public national statement that is also cited in the article. WikiGuy2517 (talk) 10:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So he is notable for making unproven accusations ? Domdeparis (talk) 13:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 01:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.