Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davina Reichman (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Davina Reichman[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Solely passing mentions + nothing comes up in Google News. Refspam is also evident TLA (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Fashion, and Australia. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I’m leaning towards deleting based on reading the two previous nominations. I find the lack of linking in the reflist telling. Notability not demonstrated, CoI issues…if the topic is notable it can be recreated RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 10:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Notability is not inherited and can someone explain why two of the sentences have 11 citations? TarnishedPath^talk 00:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources are not indepth of her. and nothing in gnews, fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.