Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Williams (Son of Dork) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Williams (Son of Dork)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability shown outside band. Apart from a small amount of uncourced personal info the article is about the band. Redirect is not appropriate due to title being not a reasonable search term. Duffbeerforme (talk) 07:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duffbeer. Just so I get the lay of the land ... you're fine w/the apparent notability of the band and other band members who have their own articles? Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 11:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The band, claims multiple charting = claims notable. James Bourne member of both Busted (band) and Son of Dork, ie member of 2*notable band = claims notable. Steve Rushton not fine, solo career may make him notable, needs more of a look. Chris Leonard, not fine with his notability, tagged article with my concern. Danny Hall, no article. duffbeerforme (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's helpful. Leaning delete, but want to see what others unearth/say, if anything.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An entry on the David Williams dab page linking to Son of Dork would be adequate.--Michig (talk) 08:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 05:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet any criterion at WP:MUSIC to warrant a separate article from Son of Dork. Jujutacular ^T · C 08:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.