Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Tyler (radio personality)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 21:53, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Tyler (radio personality)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT. Article has been around since 2007 and still has no references at all. Google searches pull up mainly blogs and self-promotion sites. Voiceover work is mostly unnamed characters, no prominent starring roles. Submitting this for discussion in case others are more familiar with his work and can provide notability. LovelyLillith (talk) 21:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 23:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 23:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable radio personality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to clear WP:GNG on the back of reliable source coverage about him in media, but this article isn't showing any. Even on a ProQuest search for older media coverage that predates Googleability, I was entirely unable to verify even the strongest potential notability claim here (his work as "the voice of CTV News"), let alone any of the weaker stuff. Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN — notability is measured by the depth of reliable source coverage in media that can be provided to support the article's content, and not just by what the article says. Bearcat (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.