Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Thul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 10:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Thul[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search found little that even approached being sigcov in reliable sources, all of which is in the context of the "Appeal for Courage". Not seeing enough to meet WP:GNG or any SNG. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:54, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG, doesn't meet WP:NPOL either. Created by an SPA. Mztourist (talk) 03:27, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:52, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:52, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks SIGCOV, check; fails WP:GNG, check; fails WP:NPOL, check; created by SPA, check. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win, but there's not nearly enough here to suggest that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independent of an unsuccessful candidacy. Bearcat (talk) 19:58, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Seems like an outdated extension of a failed state legislature campaign. KidAd • SPEAK 19:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.