Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Schittenhelm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Schittenhelm[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Professional career boils down to 48 appearances for Heidenheim, then a 3. Liga club, in 2010 and 2011. Best I could find is this article in Süddeutsche Zeitung, in which a brief biography of his was used as an example of a young (borderline) professional player who defies common stereotypes about that group to some extent. Not bad, but also not enough on its own. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 12:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Germany. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 12:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG per nominator's source analysis. I couldn't find anything better, even counting Münchner Merkur's very brief piece mentioning his work as an oestopath. Jogurney (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.