Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David S. Wall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David S. Wall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of subject not made clear and article is unreferenced. Largely edited by one editor, presumably the subject. Jsmithers09 (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)— Jsmithers09 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. }[reply]

Strong keep - full professor at University of Durham,[1] the third oldest University in England. He has a comprehensive and prodigious publication history, and edits important journals in the field of cybercrimes. He clearly passes WP:PROF. WP:COI is not fatal. Bearian (talk) 23:59, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

N.B.: Nominator's sole contribution is to nominate this BLP for deletion. Curious. Bearian (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't realise this being my first posting would be an issue. Subject is not notable - Google only brings up results from his positions at 2 Universities, pages on small time websites that he has written and listings for books he has published - but next to nothing in the way of reviews etc. Does every university professor warrant a Wikipedia entry? Jsmithers09 (talk) 18:37, 19 November 2010 (UTC)— Jsmithers09 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. }[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - appears to meet guidelines of WP:PROF. Eddie.willers (talk) 16:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not too many cites but probably reaches some of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.