Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pittman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Pittman[edit]

No assertion of importance other than that the author wrote an essay posted on the white power website, Stormfront.org. This patently fails Wikipedia's notability criteria. Prod was removed.--Fuhghettaboutit 08:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Could probably be speedied, in fact. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it does not assert notability. - Richardcavell 12:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn. Kimchi.sg | talk 12:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 14:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, very much non-notable --Deville (Talk) 16:27, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Provisional Keep due to the Stop Prisoner Rape work, but if thats along the lines of 'he volunterred one week', delete it. -M^ask 01:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and as quick as possible there is a football player with this name and I want to create the article. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 00:50, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete utterly nn, and we don't need to give advertising space to people like this.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.