Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Nicholas Wilkinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Nicholas Wilkinson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP has been tagged since August 2011 as being poorly sourced, with only a brief BBC News article from 2002 and a Guardian editorial from eight months ago (plus a further dead link): it has also been tagged for nearly a year as having a CoI, with a large proportion of the edits being by User:LouisLePrince, who has failed to respond to a comment on their talk page enquiring as to whether they are the subject of the article. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 15:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would normally argue that the Guardian and BBC are good reliable sources and anyone who says otherwise is being silly and AfD is not for cleanup. However both sources are about his films, neither are about this person at all, barely more than namechecking and it's not possible to build an article from them. Dysklyver 09:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough evidence in my view that he is notable enough. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 01:36, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.