Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David M. Fitzpatrick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. — Satori Son 22:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
David M. Fitzpatrick[edit]
- David M. Fitzpatrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Seems not nobable to me. And looks like an autobiography. fschoenm (talk) 15:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Sorry to say. Could find no information. Shoessss | Chat 15:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in the current state does not prove notability. Also, a writer without a book and publishing mainly in less known magazines by default seems a bit suspicious. Pundit|utter 16:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO due to having no coverage cited about him. Just having his articles published is not enough.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 08:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- There are no secondary sources. Not notable enough. Rigby27 (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.