Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Keyes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Keyes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been cleaned up from its heavily WP:PROMO history that came mostly from a single SPA, but the subject still isn't notable independent of the organizations he jumps between. Lagrange 613 21:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:47, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – per WP:GNG, because "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". He's written for a stellar list of publications, has been widely covered, and has got results. Former versions of the article had a good of praise for his work, which was added and then removed by the same SPA. I agree that we don't need the praise just to show that he's notable. Can't we just have an article about his activities? – Margin1522 (talk) 07:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Shame was used as an WP:advert but still clearly notable. Plot Spoiler (talk) 03:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.