Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kellogg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 November 7.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Kellogg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. He did direct Inspector Gadget, which is a fairly notable film. However, I see no real coverage of Kellogg, in depth or otherwise. There appear to be multiple individuals of this name, including a newspaper writer and an academic. They each appear to have more sources available than this Kellogg.

Yes, he has a lot of music video and ad credits, but these are, as admitted by the article 'partial' credits, meaning he worked on a team. That does not establish notability, and the awards listed are not in his name. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 15:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Being signed to a notable label indicates importance/significance. Sednablast —Preceding undated comment added 22:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What label are you referring to? To my knowledge he does not appear to be a musician. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia ^talk 12:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He is signed with Anonymous Content, therefore is involved with ongoing projects. By label I mean production media label not a record label - apologies. Sednablast 21:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE Fails to meet basic GNG. Cannot find any RS that covers him in depth. BLPs require a good level of meaningful coverage. Seems like a resume. Cannot find evidence that he is signed to a label as indicated in the article. Anonymous Content external link has no mention of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lausapwow (talk • contribs) 03:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Agree with nom that he fails WP:GNG. I go back and forth on WP:DIRECTOR. KidAd talk 04:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE Fails WP:GNG, WP:DIRECTOR. The article lacks sufficient or reliable sources for a WP:BLP, nor could I find anything myself. IMDb is a questionable source (unless footnotes are cited) with a poor reputation for checking the facts. WP should not be an indiscriminate collection of information. The article is a list of unexplained stats that lack context or verification created by a likely WP:COI, which undermines the public's confidence in WP. We must get the article right and be very firm about the use of high-quality sources with integrity. Ultraquark (talk) 22:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.