Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Jubb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Jubb[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure that this meets WP:FRINGEBLP. The New York Times article is a solid source that is about Mr Jubb, but the Washington Post is just a brief passing reference, NYM is also only a brief section in an article about someone else. The Village Voice article is about Raw Foodism generally, and mentions Jubb in passing. There's certainly some coverage here and the deletion case is borderline. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to meet WP:NBIO. —Paleo Neonate – 04:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough multiple sources that are indepth about him to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A Google News search brings up no additional reliable secondary sources. POLITANVM ^talk 00:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.