Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David J. Burton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. (WP:CSD#a7) The question of whether the new user is truly Mr. Burton are made irrelevant by the lack of sources and lack of indication of notability. Mgm|^(talk) 11:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David J. Burton[edit]

De-PRODDED. Non-notable insurance broker. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:30, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nothing indication fulfillment of WP:BIO. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 11:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - What thin veneer of claimed notability is completely unsourced anyway. Unsourced BLP, fails WP:BIO, take yer pick. §FreeRangeFrog 21:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - although largely accurate, and dare I say understated, I had no wish for this private information to be placed in the public domain in the first place. You may mail me to confirm the authenticity of this message if you so choose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjburton (talk • contribs) 22:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you know the primary author in real life, perhaps you could ask them to echo your request. Mr Stephen (talk) 22:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, this NEVER should have been de-prodded. What a silly game. JBsupreme (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as a special case, I've blanked the article and nominated it for speedy deletion, based on the comment by Davidjburton. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 09:18, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.