Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Guido Pietroni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz ^talk 04:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Guido Pietroni[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG fail, and it's also basically promotion. Unsourced.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It also might be worth mentioning that the subject seems to be the only author on the site art-insider.com, which triggers our spam blacklist. An article being promotional is not a reason for deletion, but it is a reason for a more skeptical inquiry at AfD.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a notable producer for either music or films.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.