Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Fedderly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Baseball Watcher 03:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David Fedderly[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:MUSICBIO, simply being principal tuba with the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra does not guarantee notability. gnews merely confirms his role in the orchestra nothing indepth about him as an indivual musician. [1]. LibStar (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~Week Keep seems to fail WP:MUSICBIO, but seems to have a notable feel. If anything I would lean delete, but stay neutral for now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sufficiently notable in the Tuba/Euphonium world: serves on the board of the International Tuba Euphonium Association, has held a permanent position as principal for 28 years, performs frequently as a guest principal, is on both the Julliard and Peabody faculties and has taught widely elsewhere—lots of professors and principals were taught by him. I've rewritten and added more references. - Pointillist (talk) 00:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Principal player at major orchestra and significant teacher; per Pointillist. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 00:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pointillist and close per WP:SNOW.4meter4 (talk) 11:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.