Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David D.A. Doman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David D.A. Doman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested; article lacks WP:V, also clear conflict of interest. [CharlieEchoTango] 06:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi some more sources have been sited, is this good enough? Thank you. David D.A Doman (talk) 07:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's one more, and it's not considered reliable. You need to cite trusted sources per the verifiability and source reliability policies, such as news items from well established sources (New York Times, The Guardian, that kind of stuff). See WP:42. [CharlieEchoTango] 07:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As of now, I don't see appropriate "Significant coverage", nor can I find any suitable reliable sources. If someone manages to add some, please give me a shout so I can revisit this. Chzz ► 14:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable self-promotional article. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for the concern. Newspapers do not publish production credits. Websites post production credits. There are no wikipedia production credits that are linked to major newspapers or magazines because they do not credit all producers for any given rap or r&b album or mixtape that has several producers on it. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you. David D.A Doman (talk) 01:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also an ASCAP reference is (in terms of writing credit) the most reliable source for a musical composition if the producer or composer is a member of ASCAP. David D.A Doman (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've made my case fairly above. If no one objects, could this please be taken off the potential deletion list? David D.A Doman (talk) 23:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.