Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Cragg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 20:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Cragg[edit]

David Cragg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Cannot find any secondary sources on this individual. Article appears to be strictly promotional. Rogermx (talk) 19:31, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTPROMO and the fact the subject meets no notability standards. GPL93 (talk) 22:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Does not meet general notability criteria. No significant coverage in independent, secondary sources. Spyder212 (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTPROMO. Unless some ambitious editor can seek out GNG references. Lubbad85 () 18:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete another one of far too many articles on non-notable businessmen.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I definitely agree about the surplus of non-notable articles on businessmen. Artists too. Rogermx (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.