Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Corker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
David Corker[edit]
- David Corker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Utterly non-notable solicitor. "Major claim to fame" is some mistake in his "on-line bio". So what. Camillus 20:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, A7. Stephen Turner (Talk) 12:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- NN. Notability is not inherited, nor does a lawyer inherit notability form his client. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, notability is not inherited. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 21:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete subject doesn't meet the GNG. RMHED (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.