Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Clynick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
David Clynick[edit]
- David Clynick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, in which the PRODer's rationale was: No evidence of notability per WP:BIO. Unfortunately, I could not find anything else that is substantive to build an article or establish sufficient notability. Moreover, the "Biography and career" information is not verifiable, and I couldn't find anything in the list of external links given. –MuZemike 22:24, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) –MuZemike 22:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —–MuZemike 22:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nice guy, I'm sure, but does he need a whole WP article just for himself? If so then most professionals on the planet should get articles. Think of the hard disk space required! That's why we have notability guidelines. andy (talk) 23:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to a lack of independent, reliable sources that discuss this person in depth. Cullen328 (talk) 06:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no sognificant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete another obscure, non-notable article. This is not a judgment on the person, just shouldn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. Midemer (talk) 18:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.