Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE per some combination of SNOW, SPEEDY and BLP. Jehochman Talk 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have taken the step of applying WP:SNOW rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia, WP:CSD#A7. It is a biography of a living person that entirely lacks references, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Jehochman Talk 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
David Boothroyd[edit]
- David Boothroyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a WP:BLP. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. rootology/equality 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. Nathan T 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. DavidBoothroyd (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Conti|✉ 20:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's request that the article be removed. AGK 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.