Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David B. Joslin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David B. Joslin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable living person. WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Searched in JSTOR, Newspaper Archive, Newspapers.com, Google Books, Google Scholar, Google News, etc.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:28, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. I've found lots of sources under "David Joslin" and added a few. Bearian (talk) 21:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC) P.S. Bishops of major denominations are usually kept; see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Clergy. Bearian (talk) 21:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I agree. @Bearian: good finds! The article is much better for your involvement. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 13:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep our practice id to keep Anglican bishops.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY after improvements by Bearian .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.