Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave windass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW and WP:HEY. Article now contains multiple sources. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dave windass[edit]

Unnotable. I really wished it would be speedied but I think it would be suitable to AfD. HeLLboy2HeLL (talk) 00:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep- I did find This but I'm not sure how much notability it confers. I'll give Mr. Windass the benefit of the doubt on this one. Reyk _YO! 01:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Windass is a most unfortunate, flatulent sounding name isn't it? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 01:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dean Windass is also pretty well-known........... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It rather is, when I saw this on AfD I assumed it was going to be some kind of crude attack page about someone called Dave who is known for his flatulence. But this seems like a notable enough person who's sourced pretty well, so I'll say Keep. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 13:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability is demonstrated by references from such newspapers as The Guardian, What's on Stage, Yorkshire Post, Driffield Post and Hull Daily Mail. ~~Would the closing admin please move the article to Dave Windass, with a capital W.~~ --Eastmain (talk) 01:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- - The article has already been moved to the correct spelling, Dave Windass.--Eastmain (talk) 01:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:RS. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. I see multiple reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 04:24, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article, he's notable and there's WP:RS. (No comment on the last name). MrMarkTaylor ^{What's that?/What I Do/Feed My Box} 06:16, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is in it self notable and passes WP:N it is well sourced, and the sources pass WP:RS (Although I'm not going to talk about his last name :P). All the Best,--Mifter (talk) 15:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but notable information is needed rather than just a list of his works. Beemer69 ^chitchat 02:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.