Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Dyment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per consensus and sources indicating that WP:ARTIST has been satisfied (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 12:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Dave Dyment

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Dave Dyment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can see nothing to suggest that this person passes WP:ARTIST TheLongTone (talk) 12:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:45, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• Comment I saw two decent-sized reviews in Canadian Art. He did a CD that became part of the NY MOMA collection as well. The article is very CV like and needs to be rewritten.96.127.244.201 (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Also mentioned fr his curatorial work in the Globe and Mail here and here, and in Art on Paper here, as an artist in C Magazine here, and an excellent critical review in the Queens Journal here. And here is a significant review in the Toronto Star of his artwork. That's enough for me, so I will say keep.96.127.244.201 (talk) 17:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• Keep per the sources that 96.127.244.201 has linked to. They do need to be added to the article, so that it isn't as CV like. --Theredproject (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

• Keep [1] Kraose (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.