Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Bruderly (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:04, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Bruderly[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant, in-depth coverage. Unsuccessful political candidate. Neutrality^talk 00:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass WP:NPOL. Mccapra (talk) 04:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Present achievements does not pass WP:NPOL. Articuno appears (talk) 09:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete never achieved office, fails WP:NPOL Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - losing numerous uncompetitive Congressional races is inadequate under WP:NPOL, and I'm not finding any sufficiently substantial coverage to meet the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails NPOL and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they lost — but this neither states nor reliably sources any indication whatsoever that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independently of an unsuccessful candidacy. Bearcat (talk) 04:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.